The folks at Red Line Software have a nice two-part series on how to use the Microsoft Transporter tool to perform IMAP-based migrations. This is not always as obvious a process as it might seem, so if you’re contemplating having to do this, check these articles: part 1 and part 2.
Good two-part article on IMAP-to-Exchange migration
Comments Off on Good two-part article on IMAP-to-Exchange migration
Filed under UC&C
Oracle failed to produce CEO’s e-mail
Cue the tiny violins: a federal judge ruled that Oracle “destroyed or failed to preserve Chief Executive Larry Ellison’s e-mail files sought as evidence in a class-action lawsuit filed in 2001 against the software maker.” The alleged destruction (or failure, depending on how you look at it) happened in 2006– well after Oracle touted archiving features in Oracle Collaboration Suite. Ooops.
Comments Off on Oracle failed to produce CEO’s e-mail
Filed under General Tech Stuff, Oops!, Security
Toledo shrinks, Huntsville expands
Via USA Today, this note on the Huntsville airport: not only is HSV expanding, but they’ve got contingency plans for a “sudden-growth scenario” like the arrival of a low-cost carrier. On the other hand, TOL has lost all its Delta service, meaning that I’ll be making the drive to DTW much more often (well, at least until the DL-NW merger). This is probably a pretty good symbol of the overall difference between the local economies in both cities.
Comments Off on Toledo shrinks, Huntsville expands
Filed under Travel
ISA and TMG announce virtualization plans
A few weeks ago, I wrote a column highlighting Microsoft’s announcement of their Exchange 2007 virtualization strategy. I just found out that the team that owns the Internet Security and Acceleration (ISA) Server and Forefront Threat Management Gateway (TMG) has announced their virtualization policy… and it’s a good one! Basically, they’ll support ISA and TMG on virtualization solutions that are part of the Server Virtualization Validation Program (SVVP)– including Hyper-V.
The full document is here. Here’s the money graf:
… if a hardware virtualization platform is listed as “validated” with the SVVP (not “under evaluation”), Microsoft ISA Server and Forefront TMG will be supported for production use on that platform within the limits prescribed in the Microsoft Product Support Lifecycle, Non-Microsoft hardware virtualization policies and the system requirements for that product version and edition.
This will make both ISA and TMG much more palatable to a wide variety of customers, particularly in the SMB space. I’m looking forward to redeploying ISA (which I haven’t been using for a few years) now that it won’t cost me a server’s worth of electricity to use.
Update: this VMware press release says that VMware ESX has passed the SVVP. This is huge news given that it essentially means Microsoft is now supporting Exchange, ISA, and TMG on the most widely deployed virtualization platforms– welcome air cover for all the folks who have been doing it for a while now 🙂
Comments Off on ISA and TMG announce virtualization plans
Filed under General Tech Stuff, Security
Switcheasy Capsule Rebel
I recently needed a case for my iPhone 3G. I had a CaseLogic slip case for my original iPhone, and it was a solid “OK”: a little clunky, a little ugly, but enough to get the job done. I wanted something with less bulk. On the advice of a few iPhone-toting friends, I decided to try the Switcheasy Capsule Rebel. Verdict: I love it. It looks great, and it provides an excellent tactile feel. It doesn’t feel slippery, slimy, or slick. Highly recommended.
Comments Off on Switcheasy Capsule Rebel
Filed under Reviews
Heavy snoring a risk factor for carotid athersclerosis
Wow! This puts Arlene’s complaints about my snoring in a whole new light. Apparently, heavy snoring is a risk factor for carotid atherosclerosis, as measured by an Austrian research team. Better keep an eye on that (or an ear!)
Comments Off on Heavy snoring a risk factor for carotid athersclerosis
Filed under General Stuff, Musings
Resolved: food allergy warnings not stupid
It’s always fun to joust with my friend Bob Thompson, who is perhaps the most libertarian libertarian I know. Sadly, I think he’s flat-out wrong about food allergy warnings. I admit to being biased; my wife is gluten-intolerant and I have other relatives (and friends) who suffer from various kinds of nut allergy.
The problem with the current labeling standard is this: there is no standard. Quick: what’s the difference between “may contain”, “made in the same factory with”, and “produced on the same equipment with”? If I have three products with those labels, how can I tell which one(s) (if any) are OK to bring home? The existing US law, FALCPA, requires manufacturers to label products that contain certain allergens. Manufacturers have voluntarily been adding “may contain”-style warnings to reduce their liability– but there’s no standard for doing so, and this is resulting in a lot of needless hassle for the producers and consumers.
On the gluten-free front, there is an existing EU standard for deciding which products may be labeled as “gluten-free”, based solely on measured gluten content in the final product. The FDA is in the process of adopting it, which I think is great: it gives people a tangible indicator of whether something is safe to eat, or not, irrespective of where and how it was produced. Until then, I don’t see how standardizing on a labeling phrase could possibly be a bad thing. In fact, if I’m going to have the government spending money on regulations, better they should do it for food safety than on firearms or political contributions.
Comments Off on Resolved: food allergy warnings not stupid
Filed under General Stuff, Musings
Mutual activity: Gold Rush
[ taking a cue from the LDS Young Men‘s blog, I decided to start keeping a blog of our notable mutual and young men’s activities. No pictures yet, though! ]
Last night, we had a great activity for the young men and young women in our ward. (Note to non-Mormon readers: when we do a combined activity for the YM and YW together, it’s called “mutual night” or a “mutual activity”, or even a “combined activity”.) The weather was forecast to be good, so our YW president invited another local ward to join us for a rousing game of Gold Rush, a game that pits “bandits” armed with squirt guns against “miners” who are trying to collect gold from a field. Get squirted, and you have to drop your gold. Tag a bandit, and he goes to jail and has to sing a song to get out again.
We had six or seven bandits and probably around 40-50 kids. Some of them were a little timid at first, but everyone got into the game after a short while. We saw some groups of kids who would cooperate to evade the bandits, while others relied on their superior running speed to get to the bank before getting squirted. There’s not that much strategy on the bandits’ part (apart from not running out of water in your squirt gun). It was a blast!
Comments Off on Mutual activity: Gold Rush
Filed under Spiritual Nourishment
Google: we’re almost sorry about our outage
I got some mail yesterday from Google about their recent Google Apps service outage. Here it is, along with my editorial comments.
We’re committed to making Google Apps Premier Edition a service on which your organization can depend. During the first half of August, we didn’t do this as well as we should have. We had three outages – on August 6, August 11, and August 15. The August 11 outage was experienced by nearly all Google Apps Premier users while the August 6 and 15 outages were minor and affected a very small number of Google Apps Premier users. As is typical of things associated with Google, these outages were the subject of much public commentary.
Well-deserved public commentary, at that, mostly focused on the question of why Google thinks that Google Apps is an enterprise-grade service. Three outages in a nine-day period is not confidence-building.
Through this note, we want to assure you that system reliability is a top priority at Google. When outages occur, Google engineers around the world are immediately mobilized to resolve the issue. We made mistakes in August, and we’re sorry. While we’re passionate about excellence, we can’t promise you a future that’s completely free of system interruptions. Instead, we promise you rapid resolution of any production problem; and more importantly, we promise you focused discipline on preventing recurrence of the same problem.
Notice what’s missing here: any commitment to a particular level of availability, or any information about the cause of the outage, or any information about how they applied “focused discipline” to keep it from happening again.
Given the production incidents that occurred in August, we’ll be extending the full SLA credit to all Google Apps Premier customers for the month of August, which represents a 15-day extension of your service. SLA credits will be applied to the new service term for accounts with a renewal order pending. This credit will be applied to your account automatically so there’s no action needed on your part.
So let me get this straight: in exchange for three days of outages (in fairness, not three complete outages), you’re going to give me a credit for $25/user. That’s not a bad start, but I daresay for most Google Apps customers it’s only a small fraction of their lost productivity. Not to mention that I might not want a service credit in the first place.
We’ve also heard your guidance around the need for better communication when outages occur. Here are three things that we’re doing to make things better:
We’re building a dashboard to provide you with system status information. This dashboard, which we aim to make available in a few months, will enable us to share the following information during an outage:
- A description of the problem, with emphasis on user impact. Our belief is during the course of an outage, we should be singularly focused on solving the problem. Solving production problems involves an investigative process that’s iterative. Until the problem is solved, we don’t have accurate information around root cause, much less corrective action, that will be particularly useful to you. Given this practical reality, we believe that informing you that a problem exists and assuring you that we’re working on resolving it is the useful thing to do.
- A continuously updated estimated time-to-resolution. Many of you have told us that it’s important to let you know when the problem will be solved. Once again, the answer is not always immediately known. In this case, we’ll provide regular updates to you as we progress through the troubleshooting process.
Positive steps, but note that there’s no definite delivery date. Note also the weasel language around how “assuring you” is the useful thing to do. No, fixing the problem is the useful thing to do, followed closely by timely and informative status reports. Just look at what Twitter does, then do the opposite. (Actually, for a decent model, check out how the Xbox Live service folks handle outages.)
In cases where your business requires more detailed information, we’ll provide a formal incident report within 48 hours of problem resolution. This incident report will contain the following information:
- business description of the problem, with emphasis on user impact;
- technical description of the problem, with emphasis on root cause;
- actions taken to solve the problem;
- actions taken or to be taken to prevent recurrence of the problem;
- e. time line of the outage.
This is more like it! However, my business always requires this detailed information. Who says so? I do. I’m betting that Google will closely control this information, and that they will only provide it if they think your business requires such information.
In cases where your business requires an in-depth dialogue about the outage, we’ll support your internal communication process through participation in post-mortem calls with you and your management team.
Translated: “if you take heat for our outages, we’ll be happy to get on the phone and help spin the problem so we don’t lose your account.”
Once again, thanks for you continued support and understanding.
Sincerely, The Google Apps Team
Exchange 2007 transport config file settings
While tech editing an article by Tony Redmond on Exchange transport back pressure, I wanted to look up the value of a setting in EdgeTransport.exe.config. Here’s the best guide I’ve found to the settings in that file.
Comments Off on Exchange 2007 transport config file settings
Filed under UC&C
Get a Kindle for $259
This is a pretty sweet deal: Amazon will sell you a Kindle for $259 if you apply for (and qualify for, it must be said) their Amazon-branded credit card from Chase. See details here. (Bonus link: James Fallows on how to avoid becoming a Kindle nerd-bore).
Comments Off on Get a Kindle for $259
Filed under Friends & Family, General Stuff
Exchange System Manager for Vista
Yay! We finally have a supported version of Exchange System Manager that runs on Vista. Get it here.
Comments Off on Exchange System Manager for Vista
Filed under UC&C
Experimenting with Twitter
I’ve decided to give Twitter a try. So far, I’m following Chris, Ed Brill, Erica, and Al Tompkins. Follow me here.
Comments Off on Experimenting with Twitter
Filed under General Stuff, UC&C
Oracle gets hammered on security
It’s like a joke that never gets old. I’ve written about Oracle’s terrible approach to product security before (here, here, here, and here are a few examples… bonus: this). Now security legend Jericho has written this outstanding timeline of exactly what Oracle has failed to do in the security arena. He should have subtitled it “Bring Me the Head of Mary Ann Davidson”. Well worth a read.
Comments Off on Oracle gets hammered on security
Filed under Security, Smackdown!
Droppin’ science for real
The fine folks at CERN have made an enthralling yet educational rap video about the Large Hadron Collider. FTW!
Comments Off on Droppin’ science for real
Filed under General Stuff
